Home
News
Latest news
European Language Gazette
About us
About Us - Overview
Putting plurilingualism into practice
Structure of the ECML
National Nominating Authorities
Governing Board
Contact points
Consultants
ECML Member States
Staff
Professional network forum
Send request
Traineeships at the ECML
Press and information
Contact
Themes
Overview
Language teacher competences
Sign languages
Plurilingual and intercultural education
New Media in Language Education
Migrant education and employment
Evaluation and Assessment
Early language learning
Content and Language Integrated Learning
Languages of schooling
Programm
Overview
ECML Calendar
Programme 2024-2027
AI for language education
Deeper learning in the foreign language classroom: pluriliteracies for global citizenship
Developing competences for democratic culture for young learners through language education
Unlocking educational opportunities in sign languages in Europe
CLIL-Lehrmaterialien für die Entwicklung von Schlüsselkompetenzen des 21. Jahrhunderts
Fostering the plurilingual wellbeing of language teachers
Integrated didactics: a toolkit for an empowering approach to languages
EFSZ-Ressourcen für die demokratische Kultur
Programm 2016-2019
Programme 2012-2015
Programme 2008-2011
Programme 2000-2003
2020-2023
Training & consultancy for member states
Practices and criteria to assess home/heritage languages’ competences of pupils (incl.migrants)
CLIL in anderen Sprachen als Englisch
CEFR Companion Volume implementation toolkit
Developing teacher competences for pluralistic approaches
Digital citizenship through language education
Enhancing language education in border-crossing professional and vocational education
Language learning pathways of young children: Making early language learning visible
Mediation in teaching, testing and assessment
Bausteine für die Planung sprachsensibler Lehrpersonenbildung
The future of language education
Think tank: Transversale Kompetenzen
Training & Consultancy
Overview
Plurilingual and intercultural education: teacher and learner competences
The CEFR Companion Volume: Mediation and other key concepts
Action research communities for language teachers
Learning environments where languages flourish
Steps towards implementing plurilingual and intercultural education
Supporting multilingual classrooms
Language for work – Work-related second language learning for adult migrants and ethnic minorities
Fostering digital citizenship through language education
ICT in language teaching and learning
The CEFR Companion Volume: Mediation and other key concepts 2
Relating language curricula, tests and examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference*
Learning environments where languages flourish 2
Plurilingual and intercultural education in early language learning
Beyond CLIL – Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning
A roadmap for schools to support the language(s) of schooling
ECML-EC Cooperation
Overview
Think tank: Fostering motivation in language education
Initiatives
Summer academy
ECML-EC Colloquium December 2022
Resources
ECML.Publications
Glossar des EFSZ
Webinars
Experts
ICT Umbrella Test
International events calendar
Test pages
The John Trim Collection
Articles and publications on the ECML
Language associations
New language versions
Supporting the linguistic integration of refugees from the Ukraine
Council of Europe recommendation
en
fr
de
Startseite
>
Programm
>
Programme 2012-2015
>
LACS
>
Q5
Using ECML resources in different contexts
Guidelines and practical examples
How do projects relate to existing priorities and developments?
How can a project be used on a stand-alone basis or be integrated into other activities?
Which aspects of an activity or project might be used? Which might need to be adapted first?
How might implementation take place? How might it be carried out in stages?
What is the potential impact of a project?
How might this be assessed/ evaluated?
What possible challenges might we face?
How might we address them?
How can project outcomes be mediated and/or communicated with others?
What is the potential impact of a project? How might this be assessed/evaluated?
Various levels of impact; different ways of assessing
This
ELP-WSU
(
The European Language Portfolio in whole-school use
) case study shows how evaluation of the project revealed several levels of impact. Impact should be integrated into evaluation if there is a need to evidence it. The case study describes a school in Hungary and adaptation of ELP for a particular purpose. In Hungary the introduction of the ELP was associated with curriculum reform, and this project was undertaken with official support. The project forged close links between the intercultural dimension and plurilingualism. Each year the Jewish community school that was home to the project sends a group of 10th-grade students on a study visit to Israel. There they use English and Hebrew (and sometimes Hungarian) to access a culture to which they already belong. This encourages them to seek other intercultural experiences, and some of them visit other countries and take part in international Jewish youth meetings. Plurilingual and intercultural experience is part of the everyday life of the school thanks to the presence of students who come from abroad or have a home language other than Hungarian; sporting and cultural events also play a role. In the Hungarian project the preparation of teachers was guided by a checklist of things to keep in mind, and questionnaires were used to evaluate the project. See Hungarian case study
here
. In addition, all of the case studies on this site contain a section focusing on impact and demonstrating different ways of evaluating it.
In the LACS network meeting, a participant reported on the following way of reviewing the impact of
CEF-ESTIM
(
Common European Framework of Reference for Languages - level estimation grid for teachers
):
•
Potential impact: Skills development; CEFR related bank of lessons and resources per level for a number of languages in the secondary curriculum
•
This was assessed/evaluated by means of:
o
Review and evaluation by teacher educators (questionnaire)
o
Review and evaluation by teachers/student teachers involved (journal, focus groups and questionnaire)
o
Feedback from students ( questionnaire)
See the
CEF-ESTIM flyer
.
Here is a
video
introducing the grid and the
training kit
including the level estimation grid and description form.
The Baltic participants in the LACS network meeting proposed that impact and use of
DOTS
(
Developing Online Teaching Skills
) could be evaluated in relation to raised awareness and teachers’ understanding of the online materials by using a real blog, shared online i.e. using DOTS itself as an
evaluation tool
.
Participants in LACS meetings reported the following impact of
MORE DOTS
: it gave teachers added resources, competence, and self-reliance in choosing the right tools for every task; it empowered teachers to use technology to reach their teaching objectives and the objectives of the curriculum; it had take-away-value, adding value in teaching practice, especially when ideas are shared with others. Ongoing evaluation could include teacher feedback and self-assessment. More can be found in the
videoclips
.
LACS
(
Language associations and collaborative support
): Participation in the
LACS workshop
by the National Contact Point in Croatia has led to greater awareness of the benefits for the state ministry of working with and supporting language teacher associations.
The impact of projects used for development in a particular context, e.g. a university teacher education programme, can be seen in the normal institutional evaluation processes, e.g. the use of
EPOSTL
(
European Portfolio for Student Teachers of Languages
) in
Bulgaria
.