Home
News & Events
About us
Themes
Programme
- Programme 2020-2023
  TRAINING AND CONSULTANCY
  
  Home language competences
  
  CLIL in languages other than English
  
  CEFR Companion Volume implementation toolbox
  
  Pluralistic teacher competences
  
  Digital citizenship through language education
  
  Crossborder vocational education
  
  Young children's language learning pathways
  
  Mediation in teaching, learning and assessment
  
  Language-sensitive teacher education
  
  Initiative: The future of language education
  
  Think tank: Transversal competences
Training & Consultancy
- Beyond CLIL – Pluriliteracies teaching for deeper learning
- A roadmap for schools to support the language(s) of schooling
EC Cooperation
Resources

en fr de

Enhancing language education in cross-border vocational education

Overview

Examples of
border regions

Cross-border vocational education

Plurilingualism

Intercultural competences

Languages, disciplines and professions

Cross-border vocational education

Language learning and teaching in cross-border vocational language education settings requires specific concepts and approaches.

During the project, we, the team members of this project, shared many different experiences and expertise from our different European border regions, in order to co-construct the following content. In addition, we carried out a Europe-wide survey on language teaching and learning in cross-border vocational education. This provided important insights into different other border regions and we are grateful to all the survey participants for their support.

Based on the survey results, we developed our guide around the following three thematic sections in cross-border vocational language education contexts:

Plurilingualism

Intercultural competences

Languages, disciplines and professions

Lessons learned from a survey on language teaching and learning in cross-border vocational education

The survey was carried out in 2021 and completed by 139 participants from many different countries/border regions as illustrated in the maps:

About half of participants work as (language) teachers; other respondents were academic researchers, teacher educators, students/trainees and further persons involved in (language) education in cross-border contexts.

What is your view?

Since every cross-border vocational (language) education context is individual, we have prepared 10 questions from our survey for you. You are invited to reflect on your language teaching and learning context. You can also share and discuss the questions and reflections with your colleagues.
What is your view?

Key findings of the survey

In general, language learning and teaching support in cross-border vocational training and teaching programmes is perceived as being somewhat insufficient, according to participants' knowledge and experience. In addition, the concept that English language skills are sufficient in today’s multilingual society needs to be discussed.

On balance, fostering intercultural competences and language skills are at the same time the most important benefits and challenges of cross-border vocational training and teaching programmes. They can also be understood as the ability to change perspectives and connect the language competence(s) to a varying social and professional context.

If you are interested in more detailed insights into the findings of our survey, please check below or follow the link here.



Survey - Part 1: Languages and cultures in border regions Survey - Part 2: Cross-border vocational education and training programmes

References

View references

Alexander R. (2018), “Developing dialogic teaching: genesis, process, trial”, Research Papers in Education No. 33 (5), pp. 561-598, https://doi.org/10.1080/02671522.2018.1481140.

Berger P. L. and Luckmann T. (1967), The social construction of reality. A treatise in the sociology of knowledge, Doubleday & co, New York.

Blommaert J. and Backus A. (2013), “Superdiverse repertoires and the individual”, in Saint-Georges I. (de) and Weber J. (eds), Multilingualism and multimodality: Current challenges for educational studies, Sense Publishers, https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-6209-266-2_2.

Bres J. (de) (2013), “Language ideologies for constructing inclusion and exclusion: Identity and interest in the metalinguistic discourse of cross-border workers in Luxembourg.”, in Barat E., Studer P. and Nekvapil J. (eds), Ideological conceptualisations of language: Discourses of linguistic diversity, Peter Lang, Frankfurt, pp. 57-83.

Busch B. (2018), “The language portrait in multilingualism research: Theoretical and methodological considerations”, Working Papers in Urban Language & Literacies, available at https://heteroglossia.net/fileadmin/user_upload/publication/
busch18._The_language_portrait_copy.pdf, accessed 5 October 2023.

Busch B. (2022), “Children’s perception of their multilingualism”, in Stavans A. and Jessner U. (eds), The Cambridge handbook of childhood multilingualism, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 215-234, https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108669771.012.

Cameron D. (2012), Verbal hygiene, Routledge, London.

Cenoz J. and Gorter D. (2011), “A holistic approach to multilingual education: Introduction”, Modern Language JournalNo. 95 (3), pp. 339-343.

Cook V. (2002), “Background to the L2 user”, in Cook V. (ed.), Portraits of the L2 user, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon, pp. 1-28.

Crystal D. (2019), The myth of the native speaker (with David Crystal), Canguro English, YouTube, available at www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-kZLP2FWUI, accessed 5 October 2023.

Cummins J. (2021), Rethinking the education of multilingual learners: A critical analysis of theoretical concepts, Multilingual Matters, Clevedon.

Derek Bok Center for Teaching and Learning (Derek Bok Center) (2022), Active learning. Harvard's Faculty of Arts and Sciences, available at https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/active-learning, accessed 17 October 2022.

Dewaele J.-M. and Saito K. (2022), “Positive Psychology can help overcome the pernicious native speaker ideology”, The European Educational Researcher, available at https://doi.org/10.31757/euer.526.

James C. and Garrett P. (2014) “The scope of Language Awareness”, in James C., Garrett P. and Candlin C. N. (eds), Language awareness in the classroom, Routledge, London, pp. 3-20.

Jessner U., Allgäuer-Hackl E. and Hofer B. (2016), “Emerging multilingual awareness in educational contexts: From theory to practice”, The Canadian Modern Language Review No. 72 (2), pp. 157-182, https://doi.org/10.3138/cmlr.274600.

Kramsch C. (1998), “The privilege of the intercultural speaker”, in Byram M. and Fleming M. (eds), Language learning in intercultural perspective, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 16-31.

Leow R. P. (2006), “The role of awareness in L2 development: Theory, research, and pedagogy”, Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching No. 2 (2), pp. 1-15.

Lovrits V. (2022), “Making meaning of multilingualism at work: from competence to conviviality”, Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2022.2047987.

Lovrits V. and Bres J. (de) (2021), “Prestigious language, pigeonholed speakers: Stances towards the ‘native English speaker’ in a multilingual European institution”, Journal of Sociolinguistics No. 25 (3), pp. 398-417.

Molinié M. (ed.) (2009), Le dessin réflexif : élément pour une herméneutique du sujet plurilingue, Université de Cergy-Pontoise, Cergy.

Panaligan J. H. and Curran N. M. (2022), “‘We are cheaper, so they hire us’: Discounted nativeness in online English teaching”, Journal of Sociolinguistics No. 26 (2), pp. 246-264, available at https://doi.org/10.1111/josl.12543.

Purschke C. and Schmalz M. (2022), “21. Mapping perceptions and knowledge of language: Societal multilingualism and its sociopragmatic grounding”, in Jucker A. and Hausendorf H. (eds), Pragmatics of space, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/Boston, pp. 679-714, available at https://doi-org.proxy.bnl.lu/10.1515/9783110693713-021.

Rymes B. (2021), How we talk about language: Exploring citizen sociolinguistics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Slavkov N., Melo-Pfeifer S. and Kerschhofer-Puhalo N. (eds) (2022), The changing face of the ‘Native Speaker’: Perspectives from multilingualism and globalization, De Gruyter Mouton, Berlin/Boston, available at https://doi.org/10.1515/9781501512353-002.

Valdés G. (2001), “Heritage language students: Profiles and possibilities”, in Peyton J., Ranard J. and McGinnis S. (eds), Heritage languages in America: Preserving a national resource, The Center for Applied Linguistics and Delta Systems, McHenry, IL, pp. 37-80.

Woolard K. A. and Schieffelin B. B. (1994), “Language ideology”, Annual Review of Anthropology No. 23 (1), pp. 55-82.

Fredriksson C. (2019), “Lernerstrategien“, in Roche J. (ed.), Sprachen lehren, Kompendium DaF/DaZ No. 5, Narr Francke Attempto, Tübingen, pp. 313-322.

Gnutzmann C. (2016), “Sprachenbewusstheit und Sprachlernkompetenz”, in Bausch K. et al. (eds), Handbuch Fremdsprachenunterricht (6^th edition), Narr Francke Attempto, Tübingen, pp. 144-149.

Martinez H. et al. (2017), “Sprachlernkompetenz”, in Tesch B. et al. (eds), Bildungsstandards aktuell: Englisch/Französisch in der Sekundarstufe II, Westermann Gruppe, Braunschweig, pp. 220-243.

Reissner C. (2020), “Intercomprehension competences in teacher training: documentation, reflection and evaluation”, in Hülsmann C., Ollivier C. and Strasser M. (eds), Lehr- und Lernkompetenzen für die Interkomprehension. Perspektiven für die mehrsprachige Bildung, Waxmann, Salzburg, pp. 189-205

McCann W. J., Klein H. G. and Stegmann T. D. (2002), EuroComRom – The Seven Sieves – How to read all the Romance Languages right away, Shaker, Aachen. [Also available in different Romance languages such as French, Spanish or Portuguese]

Marx N. and Hufeisen B. (2014), EuroComGerm – Die sieben Siebe. Germanische Sprachen lesen lernen(2^nd edition), Shaker, Aachen. (Only available in German)

Hemming E., Klein H. G. and Reissner C. (2011), English – the Bridge to the Romance languages, Shaker, Aachen.

Tafel K. et al. (2009), Slavische Interkomprehension. Eine Einführung, Tübingen.

Polzin-Haumann, C. and Reissner C. (2020), “Research on intercomprehension in Germany: from theory to school practice and vice versa”, in Kirsch C. and Duarte J. (eds), Multilingual approaches for teaching and learning, Routledge, London/New York, pp. 114-130.

Hemming E., Klein H. G. and Reissner C. (2011), English – The bridge to the Romance languages, Shaker, Aachen.

Image by pch.vector and by pch.vector on Freepik

Home

>

Programme

>

Programme 2020-2023

>

Crossborder vocational education

>

Cross border vocational education

Enhancing language education in cross-border vocational education

Cross-border vocational education

What is your view?

Key findings of the survey

References